From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 21:12:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 21:12:49 -0400 Received: from penguin.e-mind.com ([195.223.140.120]:19490 "EHLO penguin.e-mind.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 21:12:35 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 03:12:27 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: "D . W . Howells" Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] rw_semaphores, optimisations Message-ID: <20010423031227.E21558@athlon.random> In-Reply-To: <01042223522900.05293@orion.ddi.co.uk> <20010423030441.D21558@athlon.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010423030441.D21558@athlon.random>; from andrea@suse.de on Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 03:04:41AM +0200 X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 03:04:41AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > that is supposed to be a performance optimization, I do the same too in my code. ah no I see what you mean, yes you are hurted by that. I'm waiting your #try 3 against pre6, by that time I hope to be able to make a run of the benchmark of my asm version too (I will grow the graph). Andrea