From: "J . A . Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
To: Jesse Pollard <pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil>
Cc: tim@tjansen.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: /proc format (was Device Registry (DevReg) Patch 0.2.0)
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 23:50:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010425235000.A3432@werewolf.able.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01042522404901.00954@cookie> <200104252116.QAA46520@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil>
In-Reply-To: <200104252116.QAA46520@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil>; from pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil on Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 23:16:10 +0200
On 04.25 Jesse Pollard wrote:
>
> Alternatively, you can always put one value per record:
> tag:value
> tag2:value2...
>
> This is still simpler than XML to read, and to generate.
>
Just my two cents.
It looks clear that /proc is for programs, not for humans. So the best format
for proc is just binary values. So programs can read it quickly, even in
a chunk if they know the format. But sometimes it is usefull to do a cat on
a /proc entry.
Question: it is possible to redirect the same fs call (say read) to different
implementations, based on the open mode of the file descriptor ? So, if
you open the entry in binary, you just get the number chunk, if you open
it in ascii you get a pretty printed version, or a format description like
Bus: %d
Device: %h
..
to 'vprintf' the values.
--
J.A. Magallon # Let the source
mailto:jamagallon@able.es # be with you, Luke...
Linux werewolf 2.4.3-ac14 #1 SMP Wed Apr 25 02:07:45 CEST 2001 i686
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-25 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-25 17:10 Device Registry (DevReg) Patch 0.2.0 Dan Kegel
2001-04-25 18:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-04-25 18:55 ` /proc format (was Device Registry (DevReg) Patch 0.2.0) Tim Jansen
2001-04-25 19:19 ` Dan Kegel
2001-04-25 23:09 ` Tim Jansen
2001-04-25 19:37 ` Jesse Pollard
2001-04-25 20:08 ` Dan Kegel
2001-04-25 20:40 ` Tim Jansen
2001-04-25 21:16 ` Jesse Pollard
2001-04-25 21:50 ` J . A . Magallon [this message]
2001-04-25 21:58 ` Doug McNaught
2001-04-25 22:03 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-04-25 22:24 ` Marko Kreen
2001-04-25 22:42 ` Alexander Viro
2001-04-25 22:24 ` Mark Hahn
2001-04-26 14:06 ` Tim Jansen
2001-04-25 22:46 ` Tim Jansen
[not found] <200104252056.PAA44995@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil>
2001-04-25 21:10 ` Dan Kegel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-04-26 1:09 Dan Kegel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010425235000.A3432@werewolf.able.es \
--to=jamagallon@able.es \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil \
--cc=tim@tjansen.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox