From: Roger Larsson <roger.larsson@norran.net>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"J . A . Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>,
Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl>,
Wakko Warner <wakko@animx.eu.org>,
Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr>,
Goswin Brederlow <goswin.brederlow@student.uni-tuebingen.de>,
William T Wilson <fluffy@snurgle.org>,
Matt_Domsch@Dell.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit
Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 03:14:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200105020117.f421H9F03748@mailf.telia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105012143000.19012-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105012143000.19012-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva>
On Wednesday 02 May 2001 02:43, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Tue, 1 May 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
> > Rik van Riel writes:
> > > Then we will be scanning through memory looking for something to
> > > swap out (otherwise we'd not be in need of swap space, right?).
> > > At this point we can simply free up swap entries while scanning
> > > through memory looking for stuff to swap out.
> >
> > Sounds a lot like my patch I posted a few weeks ago:
>
> Not really. Your patch only reclaims swap cache pages that
> hang around after a process exit()s. What I want to do is
> reclaim swap space of pages which have been swapped in so
> we can use that swap space to swap something else out.
>
We could reclaim swap space for dirty pages. They have to be
rewritten anyway...
Or would the fragmentation risk be too high?
/RogerL
--
Roger Larsson
Skellefteå
Sweden
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-02 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-02 21:23 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Matt_Domsch
2001-03-02 23:52 ` Kenneth Johansson
2001-03-03 6:14 ` William T Wilson
2001-03-03 11:14 ` Rogier Wolff
2001-03-08 13:05 ` Goswin Brederlow
2001-04-27 10:51 ` Xavier Bestel
2001-04-27 11:13 ` Rogier Wolff
2001-04-27 20:52 ` LA Walsh
2001-04-27 21:44 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-27 22:06 ` Thomas Dodd
2001-04-27 22:40 ` Hugh Dickins
2001-04-27 22:40 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-29 15:12 ` Ingo Oeser
2001-04-27 22:44 ` LA Walsh
2001-04-28 7:47 ` Rogier Wolff
2001-04-27 22:22 ` Wakko Warner
2001-04-28 13:17 ` Rogier Wolff
2001-04-28 13:37 ` Wakko Warner
2001-04-28 14:11 ` Rogier Wolff
2001-04-28 14:28 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-04-30 18:12 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-01 13:00 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-01 16:14 ` Rogier Wolff
2001-05-01 16:35 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-02 10:54 ` Rogier Wolff
2001-05-02 11:04 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-02 12:49 ` Hugh Dickins
2001-05-02 13:43 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-02 0:28 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-02 0:34 ` David S. Miller
2001-05-02 0:43 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-02 1:14 ` Roger Larsson [this message]
2001-05-02 1:30 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-01 13:39 ` Christoph Rohland
2001-05-01 23:25 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-28 18:04 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-04-28 21:23 ` Rogier Wolff
2001-04-29 1:43 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-04-29 9:17 ` Kenneth Johansson
2001-04-28 18:21 ` David Lang
2001-04-28 21:25 ` Rogier Wolff
2001-04-30 18:14 ` Alan Cox
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-03-04 22:04 Matt_Domsch
2001-03-05 8:58 ` Christoph Rohland
2001-03-05 14:30 ` Rik van Riel
2001-03-05 14:36 ` Rik van Riel
2001-03-05 14:52 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-03-05 13:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-03-05 16:53 Andries.Brouwer
2001-04-30 18:45 Torrey Hoffman
2001-04-30 19:04 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-04-30 19:07 ` David S. Miller
2001-04-30 19:14 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-04-30 21:04 ` Andreas Ferber
2001-05-02 14:31 ` Andi Kleen
2001-05-02 22:17 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-05-04 8:16 ` Andi Kleen
2001-05-03 14:04 Ishikawa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200105020117.f421H9F03748@mailf.telia.com \
--to=roger.larsson@norran.net \
--cc=Matt_Domsch@Dell.com \
--cc=R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=fluffy@snurgle.org \
--cc=goswin.brederlow@student.uni-tuebingen.de \
--cc=jamagallon@able.es \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=wakko@animx.eu.org \
--cc=xavier.bestel@free.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox