public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jakob Østergaard" <jakob@unthought.net>
To: Peter Waltenberg <peterw@dascom.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID question
Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 17:07:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010508170755.A32160@unthought.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <988925908.1280.42.camel@agate> <XFMail.20010508124825.peterw@dascom.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20010508124825.peterw@dascom.com.au>; from peterw@dascom.com.au on Tue, May 08, 2001 at 12:48:25PM +1000

On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 12:48:25PM +1000, Peter Waltenberg wrote:
> We have a RAID 5 system thats had 2 of 6 disks in the RAID go into thermal
> shutdown. (Air-con failure).
> 
> The disks are functional, but the RAID won't restart because the superblock
> timestamps on those two disks are now out of step with the rest of the array and
> there aren't enough "good" disks to reconstruct the array.
> 
> We know there was very little activity when this happened.
> 
> Does anyone out there know of a way to hack the superblocks on the "bad" disks
> to force them to appear to be O.K. so that the RAID will restart. 

As documented in the HOWTO (http://unthought.net/Software-RAID.HOWTO), you should
re-run mkraid after making dead sure that your raidtab still corrosponds to the
RAID on your disks (it usually does unless someone screwed it up).

Run fsck on the RAID after mkraid.

-- 
................................................................
:   jakob@unthought.net   : And I see the elder races,         :
:.........................: putrid forms of man                :
:   Jakob Østergaard      : See him rise and claim the earth,  :
:        OZ9ABN           : his downfall is at hand.           :
:.........................:............{Konkhra}...............:

  reply	other threads:[~2001-05-08 15:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-05-03 21:38 OT: Here's the article text -- Microsoft Is Set to Be Top Foe of Free Code Miles Lane
2001-05-03 22:49 ` OT: Here's the article text -- Microsoft Is Set to Be Top Foe of Alan Cox
2001-05-03 23:22 ` OT: Here's the article text -- Microsoft Is Set to Be Top Foe of Free Code J . A . Magallon
2001-05-08  2:48 ` RAID question Peter Waltenberg
2001-05-08 15:07   ` Jakob Østergaard [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-07 14:55 Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-07 15:22 Bene, Martin
2001-11-07 22:09 ` Lionel Bouton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010508170755.A32160@unthought.net \
    --to=jakob@unthought.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterw@dascom.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox