From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 May 2001 09:38:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 May 2001 09:38:48 -0400 Received: from [63.95.87.168] ([63.95.87.168]:13829 "HELO xi.linuxpower.cx") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 9 May 2001 09:38:21 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 09:38:19 -0400 From: Gregory Maxwell To: jamal Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.rutgers.edu, Sally Floyd , kk@teraoptic.com, jitu@aciri.org Subject: Re: ECN: Volunteers needed Message-ID: <20010509093819.A13226@xi.linuxpower.cx> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.8i In-Reply-To: ; from hadi@cyberus.ca on Tue, May 08, 2001 at 10:31:23PM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 10:31:23PM -0400, jamal wrote: > Folks, > > ECN is about to become a Proposed Standard RFC. Thanks to > efforts from the Linux community, a few issues were discovered > in the course of deploying the code. Special kudos go to Alexey > Kuznetsov and David Miller. [snip] Anyone have any friends at AOL? I wonder what the effect on these non-conformant sites would be if AOL's proxy's became ECN enabled?