From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 10 May 2001 22:51:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 10 May 2001 22:51:34 -0400 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:35829 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 10 May 2001 22:51:17 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 19:52:00 -0700 From: Mike Fedyk To: Dax Kelson Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, usagi-users-ctl@linux-ipv6.org, linux-ipsec@freeswan.org Subject: Re: Question: Status of USAGI/FreeSWAN? Message-ID: <20010510195200.P26262@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Mike Fedyk , Dax Kelson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, usagi-users-ctl@linux-ipv6.org, linux-ipsec@freeswan.org In-Reply-To: <200105100253.f4A2rsK305959@saturn.cs.uml.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from dax@gurulabs.com on Thu, May 10, 2001 at 01:28:25AM -0600 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 01:28:25AM -0600, Dax Kelson wrote: > > FreeSWAN has IPSec for IPv4 on Linux. > > USAGI is better/more conformant IPv6 (with IPSec for IPv6 in development) > for Linux. > > The USAGI goal is to get themselves folded into the official kernel (and > glibc) at some point "in the near future". > > What are the plans to get all this (FreeSWAN,USAGI) folded into the > kernel. Are the "crypto" legal issues resolved enough now to have crypto > in the official kernel? It would nice to not to have to chase down all > these seperate components and eventually manually patch. > > I'm going a bit crazy keeping track of several different kernel patches > (IPSec,IPv6 in particular) while my *BSD friends just laugh at me. :) > > Dax > You'll probably get more response if you don't reply to an anready existing thread. Just create another message with the exact above and try again without replying... Mike