From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 10 May 2001 10:22:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 10 May 2001 10:22:27 -0400 Received: from elektra.higherplane.net ([203.37.52.137]:33941 "EHLO elektra.higherplane.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 10 May 2001 10:22:14 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 00:32:55 +1000 From: john slee To: Martin Hamilton Cc: Mart?n Marqu?s , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3 Message-ID: <20010511003255.C7653@higherplane.net> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i In-Reply-To: ; from martin@net.lut.ac.uk on Thu, May 10, 2001 at 02:14:27PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > quite a bit of scope for improvement. Commercial caching systems have > demonstrated thoughput of thousands of requests/s with similar > hardware, but I suspect Tux-ification of Squid will be necessary to not at all, search for X15 in april/may linux-kernel archives. most of the specific improvements tux made have been reduced to improvements for the general case, hence squid (or equivalent) could probably improve a fair amount. j. -- "Bobby, jiggle Grandpa's rat so it looks alive, please" -- gary larson