public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Kirby <sim@netnation.com>
To: Dan Mann <daniel_b_mann@hotmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3c590 vs. tulip
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 10:23:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010511102353.A11468@netnation.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OE73aZbF27y4RbrxUrO000014d0@hotmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <OE73aZbF27y4RbrxUrO000014d0@hotmail.com>; from daniel_b_mann@hotmail.com on Fri, May 11, 2001 at 09:27:29AM -0400

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 09:27:29AM -0400, Dan Mann wrote:

> The server has lots (ok, about 20,000 not counting the os itself) of medium
> sized files on it, ranging in size from 60k to 40MB.  When I run gqview
> (image viewing program) on the client and point to a local directory that is
> mapped to the server using samba, the images (over 4000 in one directory)
> are displayed absolutely as fast as I can click my mouse button.  No lag
> time whatsoever.  How can this be so fast?  Even with the images on my local
> faster machine it is much slower.  Images take at least .5 to 1 second to
> load when they are stored locally.  But over the network, with 2.4.4 and
> samba 2.2, It's as if the server "knows" what I'm going to ask for before I
> actually do.  Is this normal?  I honestly don't think it was this fast when
> server was on 2.2 Kernel with samba 2.07.

Note that the newer gqviews preload the "next" image (next based on your
previous clicking direction).  If you are clicking sequentially and give
it enough time between images, it will immediately display the next image
when you click on it.

I don't see how even if it were any sort of caching bug or something that
gqview would be able to load them that much faster -- it still has to
decode them at one point or another.

Simon-

[  Stormix Technologies Inc.  ][  NetNation Communications Inc. ]
[       sim@stormix.com       ][       sim@netnation.com        ]
[ Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of my employers. ]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-05-11 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-05-11 13:27 3c590 vs. tulip Dan Mann
2001-05-11 13:56 ` Andi Kleen
2001-05-11 14:49   ` Mystery speed: Was " Dan Mann
2001-05-14 10:06   ` Pekka Pietikainen
2001-05-11 14:23 ` Simon Kirby [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-05-14  8:09 root
2001-05-14  9:46 ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010511102353.A11468@netnation.com \
    --to=sim@netnation.com \
    --cc=daniel_b_mann@hotmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox