public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl (Rogier Wolff)
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Petr Vandrovec <VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz>,
	Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Source code compatibility in Stable series????
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 12:39:29 +0200 (MEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200105111039.MAA18522@cave.bitwizard.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010511123257.A6023@gruyere.muc.suse.de> from Andi Kleen at "May 11, 2001 12:32:57 pm"

Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 12:21:59PM +0000, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> > When I was updating VMware's vmnet, I decided to use
> > 
> > #ifdef skb_shinfo
> 
> Yes I forgot that RedHat already shipped it :-(
> 
> > This gives you maximal backward compatibility, as all public zerocopy
> > patches contain this macro. Only thing is that Dave has to remember
> > that when he turns skb_shinfo into inline function, an identity #define have
> > to be added.
> 
> No such guarantee for binary only software ;)

Right. I therefore refuse to maintain binary modules for my
clients. This usually convinces them to release source code.

But it's always been said that source code compatiblity would be
maintained. I'm a bit pissed that people just go about changing public
source-level interfaces. 

				Roger. 

-- 
** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
* There are old pilots, and there are bold pilots. 
* There are also old, bald pilots. 

  reply	other threads:[~2001-05-11 10:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-05-11 12:21 Source code compatibility in Stable series???? Petr Vandrovec
2001-05-11 10:32 ` Andi Kleen
2001-05-11 10:39   ` Rogier Wolff [this message]
2001-05-11 10:44     ` Andi Kleen
2001-05-11 10:52       ` Rogier Wolff
2001-05-11 11:19       ` David S. Miller
2001-05-11 11:19     ` David S. Miller
2001-05-11 11:16 ` David S. Miller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-05-11 13:08 Petr Vandrovec
2001-05-11  9:47 Rogier Wolff
2001-05-11  9:56 ` David S. Miller
2001-05-11 10:03   ` Andi Kleen
2001-05-11 11:13     ` David S. Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200105111039.MAA18522@cave.bitwizard.nl \
    --to=r.e.wolff@bitwizard.nl \
    --cc=VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox