From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 11 May 2001 06:52:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 11 May 2001 06:52:35 -0400 Received: from 13dyn241.delft.casema.net ([212.64.76.241]:59145 "EHLO abraracourcix.bitwizard.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 11 May 2001 06:52:25 -0400 Message-Id: <200105111052.MAA18606@cave.bitwizard.nl> Subject: Re: Source code compatibility in Stable series???? In-Reply-To: <20010511124431.A6267@gruyere.muc.suse.de> from Andi Kleen at "May 11, 2001 12:44:31 pm" To: Andi Kleen Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 12:52:19 +0200 (MEST) CC: Rogier Wolff , Petr Vandrovec , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@redhat.com From: R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl (Rogier Wolff) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL60 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andi Kleen wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 12:39:29PM +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote: > > But it's always been said that source code compatiblity would be > > maintained. I'm a bit pissed that people just go about changing public > > source-level interfaces. > > 2.4.4 is basically like 2.5.0 as far as networking is concerned, it includes major > fundamental changes to the stack. yeah. I noticed. I'm supposed to be happy about this? I'll manage, and I'll "deal with it", but not before I've told you that I'm not happy about it. Roger. -- ** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 ** *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --* * There are old pilots, and there are bold pilots. * There are also old, bald pilots.