From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 May 2001 16:00:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 May 2001 16:00:02 -0400 Received: from [194.213.32.137] ([194.213.32.137]:3332 "EHLO bug.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 14 May 2001 15:59:47 -0400 Message-ID: <20010513235231.A2075@bug.ucw.cz> Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 23:52:31 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: kernel list Cc: alan@redhat.com Subject: put_user_x Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! It seems to me that macro __put_user_x is defined in asm-i386/uaccess.h and never used. It is therefore totally unneccessary, right? [I just commented it out and recompiled; yes, it is unneccessary]. So lib/putuser.S can disappear, too. Seems to me like uaccess.h could stand some cleaning... Pavel -- I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care." Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org