From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 May 2001 17:51:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 May 2001 17:51:03 -0400 Received: from nat-pool-meridian.redhat.com ([199.183.24.200]:2156 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 14 May 2001 17:50:55 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 17:50:47 -0400 From: Bill Nottingham To: Jesper Juhl Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] missing return value from pci_xircom_fn() in drivers/char/serial.c Message-ID: <20010514175047.A19221@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Jesper Juhl , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3AFEFD06.9010500@eisenstein.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3AFEFD06.9010500@eisenstein.dk>; from juhl@eisenstein.dk on Sun, May 13, 2001 at 11:30:46PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jesper Juhl (juhl@eisenstein.dk) said: > I have made a patch against 2.4.4-ac8 that makes the change, it is > below. I guess someone more knowledgeable than me can probably see if > this is correct. If this is completely bogus, then please just disregard > this email. Yup, it's right. My bad. :) Bill