From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 17 May 2001 22:00:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 17 May 2001 21:59:50 -0400 Received: from ns1.SuSE.com ([202.58.118.2]:9996 "HELO ns1.suse.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 17 May 2001 21:59:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 18:59:41 -0700 From: Mads Martin =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F8rgensen?= To: Bill Nottingham Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac11 Message-ID: <20010517185941.K776@suse.com> In-Reply-To: <20010517214700.A15306@nostromo.devel.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010517214700.A15306@nostromo.devel.redhat.com>; from notting@redhat.com on Thu, May 17, 2001 at 09:47:00PM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Bill Nottingham [May 17. 2001 18:55]: > (catching up...) > > Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk) said: > > 2.4.4-ac9 > ... > > o Further tulip updates (Jeff Garzik) > ... > > 2.4.4-ac8 > > o Tulip driver updates (Jeff Garzik) > > These updates (sorry, haven't tracked down which of the two) conspire to > break the tulip on my ia64, it's a: You should try the newest driver from: http://sourceforge.net/projects/tulip/ -- Mads Martin Joergensen, http://mmj.dk "Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic and totally illogic, with just a little bit more effort." -- A. P. J.