From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 17 May 2001 18:57:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 17 May 2001 18:57:48 -0400 Received: from host154.207-175-42.redhat.com ([207.175.42.154]:25559 "EHLO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 17 May 2001 18:57:39 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 23:57:37 +0100 From: Tim Waugh To: Jean-Luc Coulon Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.2.xx ? messages related to parport printer ? Message-ID: <20010517235737.I11263@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3AFAAFE1.DEA0DA6D@wanadoo.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Pgaa2uWPnPrfixyx" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3AFAAFE1.DEA0DA6D@wanadoo.fr>; from jean-luc.coulon@wanadoo.fr on Thu, May 10, 2001 at 05:12:33PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Pgaa2uWPnPrfixyx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 05:12:33PM +0200, Jean-Luc Coulon wrote: > >Huh. Does it do the same thing every time you load parport_probe? > >Does it always get truncated in the same place? >=20 > Yes ! :-/ Nothing really uses that information in 2.2 anyway, so it's harmless at least. It's probably a timing thing; take a look at the differences between the 2.2 and 2.4 code for that. Tim. */ --Pgaa2uWPnPrfixyx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7BFdgONXnILZ4yVIRAgvhAJ90zdfOWII3eC7wNEoLb09Uu5rsfQCghTwy dm4lrJuyed+4G8s76QnFzWM= =gKNg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Pgaa2uWPnPrfixyx--