From: Sean Hunter <sean@dev.sportingbet.com>
To: Sasi Peter <sape@iq.rulez.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux scalability?
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 09:17:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010518091711.B26232@dev.sportingbet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e2ekt$3ua$1@cesium.transmeta.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105180914560.29042-100000@iq.rulez.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105180914560.29042-100000@iq.rulez.org>; from sape@iq.rulez.org on Fri, May 18, 2001 at 09:24:48AM +0200
Why would you want to run a web server with 8 processors rather than four
webservers with 2 each?
Sean
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 09:24:48AM +0200, Sasi Peter wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am just writing an essay, an have mentioned TUX as a performance and
> scalability linearity recort holder with TUX, referencing the specweb99
> website summary page:
>
> http://www.spec.org/osg/web99/results/web99.html
>
> However, taking a closer look, it turns out, that the above statement
> holds true only for 1 and 2 processor machines. Scalability already
> suffers at 4 processors, and at 8 processors, TUX 2.0 (7500) gets beaten
> by IIS 5.0 (8001), and these were measured on the same kind of box!
>
> How come, TUX is soooo good at the lowend (1 and 2 CPUs), and scales this
> bad?
>
> --
> SaPE - Peter, Sasi - mailto:sape@sch.hu - http://sape.iq.rulez.org/
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-18 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-18 20:24 Linux OS boilerplate Scott Long
2001-02-18 20:32 ` Jeremy Jackson
2001-02-18 21:46 ` TeknoDragon
2001-02-19 1:47 ` Alan Cox
2001-02-19 10:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-02-22 1:24 ` Tim Wright
2001-02-19 9:03 ` Paul Gortmaker
2001-02-20 4:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-05-18 6:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-05-18 7:24 ` Linux scalability? Sasi Peter
2001-05-18 8:12 ` reiser.angus
2001-05-18 8:30 ` Ronald Bultje
2001-05-18 8:30 ` reiser.angus
2001-05-18 9:05 ` Ronald Bultje
2001-05-18 19:28 ` [OT] " J Sloan
2001-05-18 19:38 ` David S. Miller
2001-05-18 19:46 ` Peter Rival
2001-05-18 19:57 ` David S. Miller
2001-05-18 20:06 ` Peter Rival
2001-05-18 20:13 ` David S. Miller
2001-05-18 21:36 ` J Sloan
2001-05-19 8:26 ` Sasi Peter
2001-05-18 8:17 ` Sean Hunter [this message]
2001-05-18 21:18 ` Rodger Donaldson
2001-05-19 8:31 ` Sasi Peter
2001-05-21 10:42 ` Sean Hunter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-05-18 18:07 Dan Kegel
2001-05-21 14:25 Dan Kegel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010518091711.B26232@dev.sportingbet.com \
--to=sean@dev.sportingbet.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sape@iq.rulez.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox