From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 12:44:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 12:44:48 -0400 Received: from ns.caldera.de ([212.34.180.1]:15746 "EHLO ns.caldera.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 12:44:37 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 18:43:10 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Eric S. Raymond" , Alan Cox , Keith Owens , CML2 , kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up Message-ID: <20010518184310.A14113@caldera.de> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , "Eric S. Raymond" , Alan Cox , Keith Owens , CML2 , kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <20010518115839.E14309@thyrsus.com> <20010518123413.I14309@thyrsus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010518123413.I14309@thyrsus.com>; from esr@thyrsus.com on Fri, May 18, 2001 at 12:34:13PM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 12:34:13PM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > Alan, it sounds very much like you just said something stupid. This > seems sufficiently unlikely that I am shaking my head in disbelief and > fingernailing wax out of both ears (and if you think doing both those > things at once is easy try it sometime :-)). > > Do you really believe that anyone is going to maintain the CML1 tools > for as long as a nanosecond after they get dropped out of the kernel tree? I _will_ continue to maintain mconfig (after mec stopped even before cml2). Christoph -- Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade.