From: Aaron Lehmann <aaronl@vitelus.com>
To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
Cc: andrewm@uow.edu.au, bcrl@redhat.com, clausen@gnu.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@transmeta.com, viro@math.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code inuserspace
Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 11:07:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010519110720.D2648@vitelus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <UTC200105191805.UAA51010.aeb@vlet.cwi.nl>
In-Reply-To: <UTC200105191805.UAA51010.aeb@vlet.cwi.nl>; from Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl on Sat, May 19, 2001 at 08:05:02PM +0200
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 08:05:02PM +0200, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:
> > initrd is an unnecessary pain in the ass for most people.
> > It had better not become mandatory.
>
> You would not notice the difference, only your kernel would be
> a bit smaller and the RRPART ioctl disappears.
Would I not notice the difference as a user, as a sysadmin, as a
kernel builder, as a kernel hacker, or all of the above?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-19 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-19 18:05 [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code inuserspace Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-19 18:07 ` Aaron Lehmann [this message]
2001-05-19 19:50 ` Brad Boyer
2001-05-19 19:37 ` Linus Torvalds
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-05-19 19:17 Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-19 11:30 Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-19 17:50 ` Aaron Lehmann
2001-05-19 18:43 ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-19 6:23 [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code in userspace Ben LaHaise
2001-05-19 6:57 ` [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code inuserspace Andrew Clausen
2001-05-19 7:04 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 7:23 ` Andrew Clausen
2001-05-19 8:30 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 10:13 ` Andrew Clausen
2001-05-19 9:11 ` Andrew Morton
2001-05-19 9:20 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 7:58 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-05-19 8:10 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 8:16 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-05-19 8:32 ` Alexander Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010519110720.D2648@vitelus.com \
--to=aaronl@vitelus.com \
--cc=Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl \
--cc=andrewm@uow.edu.au \
--cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=clausen@gnu.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox