From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 20 May 2001 21:15:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 20 May 2001 21:15:31 -0400 Received: from snark.tuxedo.org ([207.106.50.26]:37647 "EHLO snark.thyrsus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 20 May 2001 21:15:21 -0400 Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 21:13:46 -0400 From: "Eric S. Raymond" To: David Woodhouse Cc: Arjan van de Ven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosophy Message-ID: <20010520211346.A6170@thyrsus.com> Reply-To: esr@thyrsus.com Mail-Followup-To: "Eric S. Raymond" , David Woodhouse , Arjan van de Ven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <8485.990357599@redhat.com> <20010520111856.C3431@thyrsus.com> <15823.990372866@redhat.com> <20010520114411.A3600@thyrsus.com> <16267.990374170@redhat.com> <20010520131457.A3769@thyrsus.com> <18686.990380851@redhat.com> <20010520164700.H4488@thyrsus.com> <20010520165952.A9622@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <25499.990399116@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <25499.990399116@redhat.com>; from dwmw2@infradead.org on Sun, May 20, 2001 at 11:51:56PM +0100 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Woodhouse : > Let's not talk about CONFIG_AUNT_TILLIE any more, or change the existing > behaviour of config options to make that the default, until we've settled > the discussion about CML2. What discussion is that? Unless Linus has changed his mind and I don't know about it, CML2 is going in between 2.5.1 and 2.5.2. The engine is working. Why is it not yet time to discuss ruleset design and modes? -- Eric S. Raymond That the said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of the United states who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms... -- Samuel Adams, in "Phila. Independent Gazetteer", August 20, 1789