Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up

Alan Cox
2001-05-18T19:17:05Z

> For CML1 and CML2 to handle the same language, we would either have
> to live with the CML1 language's limitations or retrofit the old tools
> to speak CML2 language. The chance of the latter happening is, I think
> we can agree, effectively zero.

Being able to turn CML2 into CML1 might be the more useful exercise.

Alan