From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 21 May 2001 03:51:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 21 May 2001 03:51:33 -0400 Received: from are.twiddle.net ([64.81.246.98]:28166 "EHLO are.twiddle.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 21 May 2001 03:51:23 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 00:51:13 -0700 From: Richard Henderson To: Keith Owens Cc: Jeff Garzik , Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux Kernel Development Subject: Re: const __init Message-ID: <20010521005113.A19651@twiddle.net> Mail-Followup-To: Keith Owens , Jeff Garzik , Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux Kernel Development In-Reply-To: <3B083878.1785C27D@mandrakesoft.com> <13469.990414470@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <13469.990414470@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com>; from kaos@ocs.com.au on Mon, May 21, 2001 at 01:07:50PM +1000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 01:07:50PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote: > does cause a section conflict, egcs 1.1.2. > > Interestingly enough, if var[12] are together, without the intervening > text, then gcc does not flag an error, instead it puts both variables > in section .data.init and marks it as read only. This looks like a bug > in gcc. Fixed in compilers newer than 2 years old. r~