From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
Richard Gooch <rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephen Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Getting FS access events
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 12:29:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010523122950.E27177@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010519214443.B9550@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105191245360.14472-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105191245360.14472-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>; from torvalds@transmeta.com on Sat, May 19, 2001 at 12:47:15PM -0700
Hi,
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 12:47:15PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Sat, 19 May 2001, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > > Don't get _too_ hung up about the power-management kind of "invisible
> > > suspend/resume" sequence where you resume the whole kernel state.
> >
> > Ugh. Now I'm confused. How do you do usefull resume from disk when you
> > don't restore complete state? Do you propose something like "write
> > only pagecache to disk"?
>
> Go back to the original _reason_ for this whole discussion.
>
> It's not really a "resume" event, it's a "populate caches really
> efficiently at boot" event.
Then you'd better be sure that the cache (or at least, the saved
image) only contains data which is guaranteed not to be written
between successive restores from the same image. The big advantage of
just resuming from the state of the previous shutdown (whether it's
cache or the whole kernenl state) is that you've got a much higher
expectation that nothing on disk got modified between the save and the
restore.
--Stephen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-23 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200105140117.f4E1HqN07362@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca>
2001-05-14 1:32 ` Getting FS access events Linus Torvalds
2001-05-14 1:45 ` Larry McVoy
2001-05-14 2:39 ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-14 3:09 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-14 4:27 ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-15 4:37 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-05-23 11:37 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-14 2:24 ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-14 4:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-14 5:15 ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-14 13:04 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-14 18:00 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-05-14 20:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-14 23:19 ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-15 0:42 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-15 4:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-15 4:35 ` Larry McVoy
2001-05-15 4:57 ` David S. Miller
2001-05-15 5:12 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-15 9:10 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-15 9:48 ` Lars Brinkhoff
2001-05-15 9:54 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-15 20:17 ` Kai Henningsen
2001-05-15 20:58 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-15 21:08 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-15 4:59 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-15 17:01 ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-15 4:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-15 5:04 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-15 6:20 ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-15 6:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-15 6:49 ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-15 6:57 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-15 10:33 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-15 10:44 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-15 14:42 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-15 7:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-15 7:56 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-05-15 8:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-15 8:33 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-15 10:27 ` David Woodhouse
2001-05-15 16:00 ` Chris Mason
2001-05-15 19:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-05-15 20:03 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-15 20:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-05-15 20:15 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-15 20:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-05-15 20:22 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-15 20:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-05-15 20:31 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-15 21:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-15 21:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-05-15 21:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-15 21:53 ` Jan Harkes
2001-05-19 5:26 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-05-15 10:04 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-05-15 19:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-05-15 22:31 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-05-15 22:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-05-16 1:17 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-05-16 1:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-05-16 8:34 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-05-16 16:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-05-15 16:26 ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-15 18:02 ` Craig Milo Rogers
2001-05-15 16:17 ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-19 19:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-19 19:44 ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-19 19:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-23 11:29 ` Stephen C. Tweedie [this message]
2001-05-20 4:30 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-05-20 19:47 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-18 7:55 ` Rogier Wolff
2001-05-23 11:36 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-15 6:13 ` Richard Gooch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010523122950.E27177@redhat.com \
--to=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox