From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 26 May 2001 19:24:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 26 May 2001 19:24:26 -0400 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([209.10.41.242]:20647 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 26 May 2001 18:58:51 -0400 Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 20:14:42 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: "Ingo T. Storm" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha) Message-ID: <20010526201442.D1834@athlon.random> In-Reply-To: <3B0BFE90.CE148B7@kjist.ac.kr> <20010523210923.A730@athlon.random> <022e01c0e5fc$39ac0cf0$2e2ca8c0@buxtown.de> <20010526193649.B1834@athlon.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010526193649.B1834@athlon.random>; from andrea@suse.de on Sat, May 26, 2001 at 07:36:49PM +0200 X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 07:36:49PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > I got exactly the above when compiling for dp264 so I sent to Linus a > patch to fix those compile problems, now I suspect my fix broke the > generic compile :(, I will check that. 2.4.5aa1 compiles fine, but 2.4.5 doesn't, don't know why yet. Please backout this patch from 2.4.5 for now, this should be the right thing to do in the long run: diff -urN alpha/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c alpha-1/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c --- alpha/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c Sun Apr 1 01:17:07 2001 +++ alpha-1/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c Wed May 23 02:43:49 2001 @@ -16,15 +16,18 @@ #include #include +#define __EXTERN_INLINE inline +#include +#include +#undef __EXTERN_INLINE + #include #include #include #include #include #include -#include #include -#include #include #include "proto.h" Now I will start a robot that will tell me in some hour of computations which of the patches in my tree actually makes me to need the above patch to compile both generic and dp264 correctly. After I localized the offender patch it should be very easy to found why I need the above and 2.4.5 doesn't. Andrea