From: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
To: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: VIA IDE no go with 2.4.5-ac1
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 19:42:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010527194258.B1644@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010527144337.A15235@linuxhacker.ru> <E1543FE-0001zX-00@the-village.bc.nu> <20010527202814.A23079@linuxhacker.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20010527202814.A23079@linuxhacker.ru>; from green@linuxhacker.ru on Sun, May 27, 2001 at 08:28:14PM +0400
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 08:28:14PM +0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 05:18:20PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Vanilla 2.4.5 boots ok, but 2.4.5-ac1 finishes kernel initialisation and
> > > starts to print "hda: lost interrupt", I guess this is related to VIA IDE
> > > updates in AC kernels. Config for vanilla and AC kernel is the same.
> > > Here are the kernel logs from 2.4.5 and 2.4.5-ac1 (collected with serial
> > > ACPI: Core Subsystem version [20010208]
> > > ACPI: Subsystem enabled
> > > ACPI: Not using ACPI idle
> > > ACPI: System firmware supports: S0 S1 S4 S5
> > > hda: lost interrupt
> > > hda: lost interrupt
> > Does this still happen if you build without ACPI support. Also does
> > 'noapic' have any impact ?
> I will try this and report.
> I received this patch from Carlos E Gorges <carlos@techlinux.com.br>,
> that allows my box to boot, but DMA is not enabled by default
> (and needs to be explicitly enabled by hdparm -d1 /dev/hda) regardless of
> what is written at boot time.
>
> --- drivers/ide/via82cxxx.c.orig Sun May 27 08:10:47 2001
> +++ drivers/ide/via82cxxx.c Sun May 27 08:11:13 2001
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
> { "vt8233", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8233_0, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_100 },
> { "vt8231", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8231, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_66 },
> #endif
> - { "vt82c686b", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C686, 0x40, 0x4f, VIA_UDMA_100 | VIA_BAD_PIO },
> + { "vt82c686b", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C686, 0x40, 0x4f, VIA_UDMA_100 },
> { "vt82c686a", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C686, 0x10, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_66 },
> { "vt82c686", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C686, 0x00, 0x0f, VIA_UDMA_33 | VIA_BAD_CLK66 },
> { "vt82c596b", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C596, 0x10, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_66 },
Not sure what version you're using, but if it's 3.23 (I believe it is)
then this patch does completely nothing, because the VIA_BAD_PIO flag
isn't used.
--
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-27 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-27 10:43 VIA IDE no go with 2.4.5-ac1 Oleg Drokin
2001-05-27 16:18 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-27 16:28 ` Oleg Drokin
2001-05-27 17:42 ` Vojtech Pavlik [this message]
2001-05-27 17:06 ` Oleg Drokin
2001-05-27 17:23 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010527194258.B1644@suse.cz \
--to=vojtech@suse.cz \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=green@linuxhacker.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox