From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 27 May 2001 13:07:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 27 May 2001 13:07:37 -0400 Received: from [213.128.193.148] ([213.128.193.148]:23822 "EHLO linuxhacker.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 27 May 2001 13:07:25 -0400 Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 21:06:28 +0400 From: Oleg Drokin To: Alan Cox Cc: vojtech@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: VIA IDE no go with 2.4.5-ac1 Message-ID: <20010527210628.A998@linuxhacker.ru> In-Reply-To: <20010527144337.A15235@linuxhacker.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Sun, May 27, 2001 at 05:18:20PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 05:18:20PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > Vanilla 2.4.5 boots ok, but 2.4.5-ac1 finishes kernel initialisation and > > starts to print "hda: lost interrupt", I guess this is related to VIA IDE > > updates in AC kernels. Config for vanilla and AC kernel is the same. > > Here are the kernel logs from 2.4.5 and 2.4.5-ac1 (collected with serial > > ACPI: Core Subsystem version [20010208] > > ACPI: Subsystem enabled > > ACPI: Not using ACPI idle > > ACPI: System firmware supports: S0 S1 S4 S5 > > hda: lost interrupt > > hda: lost interrupt > Does this still happen if you build without ACPI support. Also does > 'noapic' have any impact ? It does boot once I build without ACPI. (though vanilla 2.4.5 boots regardless of that). It disabled DMA by default for some strange reason, so I get 2.5Mb/sec instead of usual 35Mb/sec from my HDD. BTW, 2.4.5-ac1 fails on unmounting reiserfs for me with this diagnostic: journal_begin called without kernel lock held kernel BUG at journal.c:423! I've seen this was reported for 2.4.5, too. Bye, Oleg