From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 28 May 2001 03:00:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 28 May 2001 03:00:43 -0400 Received: from [62.231.2.151] ([62.231.2.151]:49417 "EHLO mail.ixcelerator.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 28 May 2001 03:00:30 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 11:01:09 +0400 Message-Id: <200105280701.f4S719d03797@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> From: green@linuxhacker.ru To: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.5-ac1 hard disk corruption... acpi responsible? In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: linux.kernel User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.4 (i686)) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article you wrote: > Bad idea. The kernel ACPI is not the most debugged, the ACPI in many BIOSes > is complete garbage and there isnt a lot you can do to debug them either. > APM is a definite better choice, at least in the shorter term Too bad, we cannot get much of APM in SMP, only power-off if one gets lucky. Bye, Oleg