From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: jt@hpl.hp.com, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
Cc: Andrzej Krzysztofowicz <ankry@green.mif.pg.gda.pl>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
tori@unhappy.mine.nu, kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net #9
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 00:28:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010531002837.B21681@bug.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200105300048.CAA04583@green.mif.pg.gda.pl> <20010529180420.A14639@bougret.hpl.hp.com> <3B14493E.63F861E7@mandrakesoft.com> <20010529182506.A14727@bougret.hpl.hp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010529182506.A14727@bougret.hpl.hp.com>; from Jean Tourrilhes on Tue, May 29, 2001 at 06:25:06PM -0700
Hi!
> > This is standard kernel cleanup that makes the resulting image smaller.
> > These patches have been going into all areas of the kernel for quite
> > some time.
>
> This doesn't make it right.
Well... It does. Code should be uniform. You may like
if (
x == y
) {
printf(
"ahoj"
);
}
style of indentation, but it is not okay in kernel.
> Ok, while we are on the topic : could somebody explain me why
> we can't get gcc to do that for us ? What is preventing adding a gcc
int xyzzy;
goes to BSS, while
int xyzzy = 0
goes to DATA. That is important for some folks.
> command line flag to do exactly that ? It's not like rocket science
> (simple test) and would avoid to have tediously to go through all
It is actually not *so* easy to do it in gcc; there's patch, however.
Pavel
--
I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care."
Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-31 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-30 0:48 [PATCH] net #9 Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
2001-05-30 1:04 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2001-05-30 1:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-30 1:25 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2001-05-30 1:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-30 2:01 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2001-05-30 2:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-30 2:25 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2001-05-30 16:35 ` Hermann Himmelbauer
2001-05-30 2:13 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2001-05-30 2:17 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-30 9:33 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-05-30 22:28 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2001-05-30 9:32 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-05-30 10:28 ` Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
2001-05-30 10:30 ` Keith Owens
2001-05-30 10:43 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-05-30 10:30 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010531002837.B21681@bug.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=ankry@green.mif.pg.gda.pl \
--cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tori@unhappy.mine.nu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox