From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 31 May 2001 07:07:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 31 May 2001 07:07:07 -0400 Received: from host154.207-175-42.redhat.com ([207.175.42.154]:3474 "EHLO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 31 May 2001 07:07:01 -0400 Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 12:06:54 +0100 From: Tim Waugh To: Jamie Lokier Cc: Richard Zidlicky , tim@cyberelk.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fred Barnes Subject: Re: insl/outsl in parport_pc and !CONFIG_PCI Message-ID: <20010531120654.H13668@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20010527191613.A2808@rz.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20010529021156.B6061@pcep-jamie.cern.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Rn7IEEq3VEzCw+ji" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010529021156.B6061@pcep-jamie.cern.ch>; from lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk on Tue, May 29, 2001 at 02:11:56AM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Rn7IEEq3VEzCw+ji Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 02:11:56AM +0200, Jamie Lokier wrote: > Will 4 * inb() cycles have the same effect as 1 * inl() cycle for an EPP > mode read? 4 inb() cycles on the same port, yes, I think so (but not on successive ports). Tim. */ --Rn7IEEq3VEzCw+ji Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7FiXNONXnILZ4yVIRAsfwAJ9A3i9fee5MfJ07eHUM8Q1qOaABYACeKWrS qQar58hJNatZV2gPCperHNU= =5GW6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Rn7IEEq3VEzCw+ji--