From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 31 May 2001 19:50:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 31 May 2001 19:50:42 -0400 Received: from [213.96.124.18] ([213.96.124.18]:19691 "HELO dardhal") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 31 May 2001 19:50:32 -0400 Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 01:50:59 +0000 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Luis_Domingo_L=F3pez?= To: CML2 Subject: Re: Configure.help is complete Message-ID: <20010601015059.A4526@dardhal.mired.net> Mail-Followup-To: CML2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20010531142321.A9220@thyrsus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, 31 May 2001, at 14:23:21 -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > José Luis Domingo López : > > Would it be great to have a similar documentation for those hundreds of > > "files" under /proc ?. > > Yes, this would be wonderful. Are you volunteering to write it? > I'm not skilled enough to write even simple C or PERL programs, but maybe I could try improving linux kernel documentation. Not sure about the procedure to take nor the available time I'll have. But I'm willing to help where I can. Would be nice to know whether there is some sense in documenting the whole /proc, just the part of ot that will stay in 2.5.x or continue with what we have rught now. I'll check the mentioned program to see if there is the information I need. Stay tuned :) Regards. -- José Luis Domingo López Linux Registered User #189436 Debian GNU/Linux Potato (P166 64 MB RAM) jdomingo EN internautas PUNTO org => ¿ Spam ? Atente a las consecuencias jdomingo AT internautas DOT org => Spam at your own risk