From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 04:43:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 04:43:30 -0400 Received: from nat-pool-meridian.redhat.com ([199.183.24.200]:654 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 04:43:22 -0400 Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 04:43:20 -0400 From: Pete Zaitcev To: Tim Hockin Cc: Pete Zaitcev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] support for Cobalt Networks (x86 only) systems (for real this time) Message-ID: <20010601044320.A16582@devserv.devel.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <200106010409.f5149rl25342@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <200106010657.f516vmx11933@www.hockin.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200106010657.f516vmx11933@www.hockin.org>; from thockin@hockin.org on Thu, May 31, 2001 at 11:57:48PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > From: Tim Hockin > Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 23:57:48 -0700 (PDT) > > i2c framework is not used, I wonder why. Someone thought that > > it was too heavy perhaps? If so, I disagree. > > i2c is only in our stuff because the i2c core is not in the standard kernel > yet. As soon as it is, I will make cobalt_i2c* go away. I am puzzled by this comment. Did you look into drivers/i2c/? It certainly is a part of a stock kernel. The main user is the V4L, in drivers/media/video, but I think LM sensors use it too. -- Pete