From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 16:14:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 16:14:38 -0400 Received: from cicero2.cybercity.dk ([212.242.40.53]:30981 "HELO cicero2.cybercity.dk") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 16:14:24 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 22:14:04 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: PROFETA Mickael Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ide retry on 2.4.5-ac7 Message-ID: <20010604221404.A19333@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20010604140207.A529@alezan.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010604140207.A529@alezan.dyndns.org>; from profeta@crans.ens-cachan.fr on Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 02:02:07PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 04 2001, PROFETA Mickael wrote: > Hi > > Since my first try on 2.4 kernel, I had trouble with DMA when I > select activate on boot time because it selects udma4, whereas > my HD is only able to do udma2. I correct that with hdparm, but > I was quite happy of the patch in ac4 whixh detect ide lost > interrupt and retry with a value lower of dma. But it seems > that this patch does not work anymore in ac7?? I can not see in > the changelog that you come back or made other change in ide?? > Should it work in the same way or not? > > My hardware: via 686a of course, with Athlon 500 on a k7m MB It worked sucessfully for you in 2.4.5-ac4 but not in -ac7? I can't see any changes to the patch, so more details on the nature of the problem would be helpful. -- Jens Axboe