public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Louis Lam <lsauchun@hotmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question on Loop and PPDD devices
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 16:12:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010608161245.D506@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F220D8GIOlHmt9QmQMm0001b386@hotmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <F220D8GIOlHmt9QmQMm0001b386@hotmail.com>; from lsauchun@hotmail.com on Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 09:50:38PM +0800

On Fri, Jun 08 2001, Louis Lam wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm quite new to kernel development, please advice....
> 
> Got some questions about Loop and PPDD Devices.
> 
> *For 2.2 kernels, there are loop-specific modifications in ll_rw_block.c, in 
> make_request(), where the max_req is divided by two. Comments read: loop 
> uses two requests, 1 for loop and the other for real device.
> 
> Q1. How is it exactly using two requests?

FS generates request, received by loop. loop reads/writes the buffer on
the real device, that uses another request.

> Q2. Requests are made to the loop device and when will it generate another 
> request to the real device?

Yes

> Q3. Does the loop device have its own request queue? Or is it using the same 
> request queue as the actual device it is associated with?

No -- in 2.4 it does, all queues have their own request freelist.
However the way that loop works in 2.4, it doesn't allocate/use any
requests at all.

> Q4. What is the relationship between loop device driver and the actual disc 
> driver? How/When is data actually written/read from the disk?

Well data is read/written to loop, which then generates a matching
request for the target device.

> Q4. Where can I gather more information on the principles behind the how 
> loop devices work? Any particular person who might be able to help?

The source is right there, under your nose.

> *I'm Using ppdd to encrypt my swap data, it is very similar to the loop 
> device. Currently as suggested by the instructions, I'm using a swap file in 
> an encrypted partition. I'm trying to port it to the 2.2.14-5.0(Redhat 6.2 
> Kernel)and noticed that when I try to run something like "make -j 3" , there 
> are errors in decryption. This did not happen on a standard 2.2.13 kernel. 
> Sometimes it deadlocks as well(quite intermittent, but usually when I just 
> changed the swap space to the encrypted file).
> 
> Q6: What should I be looking for in order to port it to that kernel? 
> Understand there are changes to buffer.c and various other files related to 
> block I/O, and possibly some to memory management as well.

Just dive in, learn as you go along. Or look at loop + crypto patches.

-- 
Jens Axboe


      reply	other threads:[~2001-06-08 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-06-08 13:50 Question on Loop and PPDD devices Louis Lam
2001-06-08 14:12 ` Jens Axboe [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010608161245.D506@suse.de \
    --to=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lsauchun@hotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox