public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dawson Engler <engler@csl.Stanford.EDU>
To: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [CHECKER] a couple potential deadlocks in 2.4.5-ac8
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 00:45:05 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200106100745.AAA20952@csl.Stanford.EDU> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0106092313280.27431-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> from "Linus Torvalds" at Jun 09, 2001 11:19:07 PM

> > Sure, it's a pretty interaction.  To be sure about the rule: any *_user
> > call can be treated as an implicit invocation of do_page_fault?  
> 
> As a first approximation, yes. The exception cases are certain callers
> that use kernel addresses and set_fs(KERNEL_DS) in order to "fake"
> arguments to system calls etc, but I doubt they should need any
> special-casing.

I already have to special case the set_fs calls for the user-pointer
security checker.  It shouldn't be too much trouble to reuse the code.
Thanks for the early warning.

Dawson

      reply	other threads:[~2001-06-10  7:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-06-09  7:59 [CHECKER] a couple potential deadlocks in 2.4.5-ac8 Dawson Engler
2001-06-09  8:11 ` checker suggestion Albert D. Cahalan
2001-06-10  2:04   ` Dawson Engler
2001-06-09 10:45 ` [CHECKER] a couple potential deadlocks in 2.4.5-ac8 Alexander Viro
2001-06-09 17:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-06-09 17:45   ` Alexander Viro
2001-06-09 19:01     ` Linus Torvalds
2001-06-09 19:33       ` David Woodhouse
2001-06-09 20:37         ` Linus Torvalds
2001-06-10 11:53         ` Rusty Russell
2001-06-10 11:59           ` David Woodhouse
2001-06-09 19:36       ` Alexander Viro
2001-06-09 20:42         ` Linus Torvalds
2001-06-09 21:44           ` Alexander Viro
2001-06-10  2:28       ` Dawson Engler
2001-06-10  6:19         ` Linus Torvalds
2001-06-10  7:45           ` Dawson Engler [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200106100745.AAA20952@csl.Stanford.EDU \
    --to=engler@csl.stanford.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox