From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:32:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:32:33 -0400 Received: from [213.96.124.18] ([213.96.124.18]:42221 "HELO dardhal") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:32:15 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 23:33:02 +0000 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Luis_Domingo_L=F3pez?= To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IPsec support Message-ID: <20010614233302.A3000@dardhal.mired.net> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, 14 June 2001, at 12:30:02 -0600, yiding_wang@agilent.com wrote: > Folks, > > I checked 2.4.x source code but did not find any code for IPsec. Does > anyone know that current or latest Linux support IPsec? Or does anyone know > who is working on this ipv6 issue? > Check FreeS/WAN (www.freeswan.org), seems to work fine for many people, and seems to interoperate with other vendors' products. PS: are there any plans for integrating widely known (and maybe stable and interesting enough) kernel patches into the mainstream kernel in the 2.6.x timeframe ?. I was thinking about things like FreeS/WAN, LIDS and so on (and maybe other interesting ones I'm unaware of :). -- José Luis Domingo López Linux Registered User #189436 Debian GNU/Linux Potato (P166 64 MB RAM) jdomingo EN internautas PUNTO org => ¿ Spam ? Atente a las consecuencias jdomingo AT internautas DOT org => Spam at your own risk