From: Pete Wyckoff <pw@osc.edu>
To: Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: getrusage vs /proc/pid/stat?
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:44:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010618134433.C9415@osc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B2D8ED0.40B299B5@kegel.com>
In-Reply-To: <3B2D8ED0.40B299B5@kegel.com>; from dank@kegel.com on Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 10:17:04PM -0700
dank@kegel.com said:
> I'd like to monitor CPU, memory, and I/O utilization in a
> long-running multithreaded daemon under kernels 2.2, 2.4,
> and possibly also Solaris (#ifdefs are ok).
>
> getrusage() looked promising, and might even work for CPU utilization.
> Dunno if it returns info for all child threads yet, haven't tried it.
> In Linux, though, getrusage() doesn't return any info about RAM.
>
> I know I can get the RSS and VSIZE under Linux by parsing /proc/pid/stat,
> but was hoping for a faster interface (although I suppose a seek,
> a read, and an ascii parse isn't *that* slow). Is /proc/pid/stat
> the only way to go under Linux to monitor RSS?
getrusage() isn't really the system call you want for this.
There is a max RSS value, which linux could support but doesn't, but
you seem to want to see the current RSS over time. Search the archive
for various patches/complaints about getrusage.
For vsize, most OSes offer time-integral averages of text, data, and
stack sizes via getrusage(). Again, more of an aggregate than a current
snapshot, and again, linux returns zero for these currently.
-- Pete
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-18 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-18 5:17 getrusage vs /proc/pid/stat? Dan Kegel
2001-06-18 17:44 ` Pete Wyckoff [this message]
2001-06-18 21:20 ` Dan Kegel
2001-06-18 23:34 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-06-19 15:05 ` Dan Kegel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010618134433.C9415@osc.edu \
--to=pw@osc.edu \
--cc=dank@kegel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox