From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:49:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:49:38 -0400 Received: from odin.sinectis.com.ar ([216.244.192.158]:30995 "EHLO mail.sinectis.com.ar") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:49:25 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:50:33 -0300 From: John R Lenton To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: How to compile on one machine and install on another? Message-ID: <20010619185033.A2970@grulic.org.ar> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 04:55:10PM -0400, Tom Diehl wrote: >=20 > What is the best way to install the modules? Is there a directory _all_ of > the modules exist in b4 you do "make modules_install". I usually end up > setting EXTRAVERSION to something unique and doing a make modules_install. > That way it does not hose up the modules for the build machine. > Is there a better way? make-kpkg takes care of all that for you (it's part of kernel-package) --=20 John Lenton (john@grulic.org.ar) -- Random fortune: No doubt Jack the Ripper excused himself on the grounds that it was human nature. --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7L8kpgPqu395ykGsRAm99AJ9N5X8U4GRW/wYHtfo4yoi6mwR+1wCgknTB VM0mfvmNRtpw97OtzFySGac= =/VZa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb--