From: klink@clouddancer.com (Colonel)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What are the VM motivations??
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 20:40:00 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010625034000.BB6BC784C4@mail.clouddancer.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9h54u8$341$1@ns1.clouddancer.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0106241332540.7419-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva> <20010624161502.4D75C784C4@mail.clouddancer.com> <9h54u8$341$1@ns1.clouddancer.com>
In clouddancer.list.kernel, you wrote:
>
>On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Colonel wrote:
>
>> It's simple. I want the old reliable behavior back, the one I found
>> in kernels from 1.1.41 thru 2.2.14.
>
>And which one would that be ? Note that there have been
>4 different VM subsystems in that time and the kernel has
>made the transition from the buffer cache to the page cache
>in that period.
Once again a typical Rik comment. Completely misses the point and
picks something obscure to comment upon, after carefully removing the
remaining text. PICK ONE!
>Please make up your mind before making feature requests ;)
Try OPENING yours. There really is a world beyond your nose.
--
"Or heck, let's just make the VM a _real_ Neural Network, that self
trains itself to the load you put on the system. Hideously complex and
evil? Well, why not wire up that roach on the floor, eating that stale
cheese doodle. It can't do any worse job on VM that some of the VM
patches I've seen..." -- Jason McMullan
ditto
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-25 3:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-21 23:01 What are the VM motivations?? Jason McMullan
2001-06-21 23:32 ` [OT] " Justin Guyett
2001-06-22 1:13 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-22 0:23 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-23 20:23 ` watermodem
2001-07-01 23:58 ` Mark H. Wood
2001-06-23 2:03 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-06-24 15:04 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-24 18:01 ` Jason McMullan
2001-06-24 18:26 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-24 18:52 ` Jason McMullan
2001-06-24 19:29 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-24 20:29 ` Jason McMullan
2001-06-24 20:49 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-24 20:39 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-06-24 20:33 ` Stephen Satchell
2001-06-25 1:46 ` Russell Leighton
2001-06-25 2:53 ` Daniel Phillips
[not found] ` <9h6916$4og$1@ns1.clouddancer.com>
2001-06-25 3:44 ` Colonel
2001-06-25 4:04 ` Daniel Phillips
[not found] ` <9h6d6b$509$1@ns1.clouddancer.com>
2001-06-25 15:46 ` Colonel
2001-06-25 16:25 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-06-25 17:53 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-25 17:48 ` Rik van Riel
[not found] ` <9h4vln$2tg$1@ns1.clouddancer.com>
2001-06-24 16:15 ` Colonel
2001-06-24 16:34 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-24 19:11 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
[not found] ` <9h54u8$341$1@ns1.clouddancer.com>
2001-06-25 3:40 ` Colonel [this message]
2001-07-01 14:43 ` Mark H. Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010625034000.BB6BC784C4@mail.clouddancer.com \
--to=klink@clouddancer.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox