From: klink@clouddancer.com (Colonel)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What are the VM motivations??
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 20:44:27 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010625034427.65260784D9@mail.clouddancer.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9h6916$4og$1@ns1.clouddancer.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010621190103.A888@jmcmullan.resilience.com> <20010624140114.A10745@jmcmullan.resilience.com> <3B3697FB.3B7F098@247media.com> <01062504534600.16346@starship> <3B3697FB.3B7F098@247media.com> <9h6916$4og$1@ns1.clouddancer.com>
In clouddancer.list.kernel, you wrote:
>
>On Monday 25 June 2001 03:46, Russell Leighton wrote:
>> I read this thread as asking the question:
>>
>> If VM management is viewed as an optimization problem,
>> then what exactly is the function that you are optimizing and what are
>> the constraints?
>>
>> If you could express that well with a even a very loose model, then
>> the code could be reviewed to see if it was really doing what was intended
>> and assumptions could be tested.
>
>May I suggested an algorithm?
>
> - Write down what you think the optimization constraints are.
> (be specific, for example, enumerate all the flavors of page types -
> process code, process data, page cache file data, page cache swap
> cache, anonymous, shmem, etc.)
>
> - Write down what you think the current algorithms are.
> (again, be specific, use file names, function names, pseudocode and
> snippets of existing code.)
>
> - Send it to Rik. He'll tell you if it's right.
POST IT. Give the rest of us some clues and the opportunity to check
evaluator's replies.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-25 3:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-21 23:01 What are the VM motivations?? Jason McMullan
2001-06-21 23:32 ` [OT] " Justin Guyett
2001-06-22 1:13 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-22 0:23 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-23 20:23 ` watermodem
2001-07-01 23:58 ` Mark H. Wood
2001-06-23 2:03 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-06-24 15:04 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-24 18:01 ` Jason McMullan
2001-06-24 18:26 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-24 18:52 ` Jason McMullan
2001-06-24 19:29 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-24 20:29 ` Jason McMullan
2001-06-24 20:49 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-24 20:39 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-06-24 20:33 ` Stephen Satchell
2001-06-25 1:46 ` Russell Leighton
2001-06-25 2:53 ` Daniel Phillips
[not found] ` <9h6916$4og$1@ns1.clouddancer.com>
2001-06-25 3:44 ` Colonel [this message]
2001-06-25 4:04 ` Daniel Phillips
[not found] ` <9h6d6b$509$1@ns1.clouddancer.com>
2001-06-25 15:46 ` Colonel
2001-06-25 16:25 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-06-25 17:53 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-25 17:48 ` Rik van Riel
[not found] ` <9h4vln$2tg$1@ns1.clouddancer.com>
2001-06-24 16:15 ` Colonel
2001-06-24 16:34 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-24 19:11 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
[not found] ` <9h54u8$341$1@ns1.clouddancer.com>
2001-06-25 3:40 ` Colonel
2001-07-01 14:43 ` Mark H. Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010625034427.65260784D9@mail.clouddancer.com \
--to=klink@clouddancer.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox