From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:11:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:11:00 -0400 Received: from mnh-1-19.mv.com ([207.22.10.51]:25350 "EHLO ccure.karaya.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:10:50 -0400 Message-Id: <200106251825.NAA02909@ccure.karaya.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 To: "Bulent Abali" cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Stevenson , riel@conectiva.com.br Subject: Re: all processes waiting in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:48:46 -0400." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:25:22 -0500 From: Jeff Dike Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org abali@us.ibm.com said: > Can you give more details? Was there an aic7xxx scsi driver on the > box? run_task_queue(&tq_disk) should eventually unlock those pages but > they remain locked. I am trying to narrow it down to fs/buffer code > or the SCSI driver aic7xxx in my case. Rik would be the one to tell you whether there was an aic7xxx driver on the physical box. There obviously isn't one on UML, so if we're looking at the same bug, it's in the generic code. Jeff