From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 17:29:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 17:29:06 -0400 Received: from force.4t2.com ([195.230.37.100]:7192 "EHLO force.4t2.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 17:28:54 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 23:13:57 +0200 From: Thomas Weber To: Helge Hafting Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.6pre iptables masquerading seems to kill eth0 Message-ID: <20010625231357.A9560@4t2.com> In-Reply-To: <3B31A652.85D2E597@idb.hist.no> <9gtmol$9ve$1@pandemonium.abyss.4t2.com> <3B32F1BA.C43BBE8A@idb.hist.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B32F1BA.C43BBE8A@idb.hist.no>; from helgehaf@idb.hist.no on Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 09:20:26AM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 09:20:26AM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote: > Thomas Weber wrote: > > > > I'm on 2.4.6pre3 + freeswan/ipsec on my gateway now for 5 days. > > It's an old 486/66 32MB with several isdn links, a dsl uplink (with > > iptables masquerading) behind a ne2k clone and a 3c509 to the inside network. > > no problems at all with the interfaces (all compiled as modules). > > Nice to know it works for you. The troubled machine is a dual celeron, > so it could be some sort of SMP problem. I am trying pre5 > to see if it is better, I'll probably know in a few days. since i just read another report on the list I checked again and it seems like i messed it up: you were talking about the 3c905, but I have a 3c509 (ISA) card. I should have known, it's not the first time i mixed them up :( Tom