From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 09:54:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 09:54:12 -0400 Received: from host154.207-175-42.redhat.com ([207.175.42.154]:43174 "EHLO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 09:53:57 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:53:55 +0100 From: Tim Waugh To: Keith Owens Cc: Simon Huggins , lkml Subject: Re: parport_pc tries to load parport_serial automatically Message-ID: <20010626145355.Z7663@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20010626145531.J3776@paranoidfreak.co.uk> <11144.993562639@ocs3.ocs-net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lztQ+1iCVb2Kc5VU" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <11144.993562639@ocs3.ocs-net>; from kaos@ocs.com.au on Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 11:37:19PM +1000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --lztQ+1iCVb2Kc5VU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 11:37:19PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote: > "below parport_pc parport-serial" is even cleaner. One line, modprobe > does everything else. Would this have any different effect than the current situation if parport_serial fails to load? Tim. */ --lztQ+1iCVb2Kc5VU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7OJPwONXnILZ4yVIRAk9HAKCQOYztmFWsEWa4aPC4STluskbnPgCfdPuZ zH54UYl7BibMLP3j0HLPqgA= =GW9N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lztQ+1iCVb2Kc5VU--