public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@horizon.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tom@lpsg.demon.co.uk
Subject: What's the status of kernel PNP?
Date: 7 Jul 2001 05:48:20 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010707054820.720.qmail@science.horizon.com> (raw)

I just noticed that 2.4.6-ac1 parport won't compile (well, link) without
the kernel PnP stuff configured.  So I tried turning it on.

It prints a line saying that it found my modem at boot time, but doesn't
actually configure it, so I have to run isapnp anyway if I want to use it.

Okay, RTFM time... Documentation/isapnp.txt doesn't say anything about
boot time (only /proc/isapnp usage after boot and some function call
interfaces for kernel programming that are hard to follow).

kernel-parameters.txt gives a hint, although it required reading the
source code to figure out what to pass as "isapnp=" to turn verbose up.

A lot of google searching comes up with a lot of stale data but the only
2.4-relevant kernel ISAPNP howto is written in Japanese.  Lots of stuff
describes it as a feature in the 2.4 kernels, but I can't find anything
on how to use it.

MAINTAINERS claims that it's maintained, but the web page is down (the
whole site has moved, and /~pnp doesn't exist on the new site) and the
only mailing list archives I can find for pnp-devel (at geocrawler)
doesn't have any updates since the year 2000 - and those are all spam.

I'm a little suspect about that maintained status, although I haven't
written the maintainer yet.


But the upshot of all of this is that I can't figure out WTF to do with
this "feature", since I haven't noticed it actually doing anything except
taking up kernel memory.


On another machine, with an ISA PCMCIA adapter, which works with isapnp
and David Hinds' PCMCIA package, but if I try to use the 2.4 cardbus
code, it fails to probe the PCMCIA adapter, apparently because the PnP
code again didn't set it up.  (And there's no obvious way to force a
re-probe after boot unless I build the whole thing as a module.)  Again,
the PnP code cheerfully points out that the PCMCIA adpater exists, but
doesn't appear to grasp the concept that I didn't put the adapter into
the machine because it looks pretty.


Can someome point me at TFM or some other source of information?  I'd be
much obliged.

             reply	other threads:[~2001-07-07  5:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-07-07  5:48 linux [this message]
     [not found] <20010709105756.A18230@orbita1.ru>
     [not found] ` <20010709073410.1567.qmail@science.horizon.com>
2001-07-09  8:51   ` What's the status of kernel PNP? pazke
     [not found]     ` <20010709112502.3364.qmail@science.horizon.com>
2001-07-11 14:12       ` pazke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010707054820.720.qmail@science.horizon.com \
    --to=linux@horizon.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tom@lpsg.demon.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox