From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 08:48:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 08:48:47 -0400 Received: from mail9.bigmailbox.com ([209.132.220.40]:33287 "EHLO mail9.bigmailbox.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 08:48:39 -0400 Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 05:48:34 -0700 Message-Id: <200107091248.FAA12273@mail9.bigmailbox.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.116) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-Ip: [64.40.38.191] From: "Colin Bayer" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: ketil@froyn.com Subject: RE: 0k shared? Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ketil, > As you can see, there is no shared memory here. Is this something I > ought to worry about, or is it normal? I've been using the system, > and since things were lagging, I looked at 'top', and this just > caught my eye. > Any reason for worry? > > And if you *really* want me to, I can see if I can reproduce this, > though I'd rather not. :-) > Hate to say this, but RTFFAQ. On the linux-kernel FAQ (I forget the address), it mentions that in kernel 2.4.x, it became too hard to compute sharedmem, so they just left it blank... 8-) -- Colin On the first day, man created the computer. On the second day, God proclaimed from the heavens, "F0 0F C7 C8". ------------------------------------------------------------ The CompNerd Network: http://www.compnerd.com/ Where a nerd can be a nerd. Get your free webmail@compnerd.net!