From: Jonathan Lahr <lahr@us.ibm.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: io_request_lock patch?
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:49:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010710124903.H6013@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010709123936.E6013@us.ibm.com> <20010709214453.U16505@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <20010709214453.U16505@suse.de>; from axboe@suse.de on Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 09:44:53PM +0200
Jens Axboe [axboe@suse.de] wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09 2001, Jonathan Lahr wrote:
> >
> > I have heard that a patch to reduce io_request_lock contention by
> > breaking it into per queue locks was released in the past. Does
> > anyone know where I could find this patch if it exists?
>
> I had a patch about a year ago that did it safely for the block layer
> and IDE at least, and also for selected SCSI hba's. Some of the latter
> variety are pretty hard and/or tedious to fixup, Eric Y has done some
> work automating this process almost completely. Until that is done, the
> general patch has no chance of being integrated.
I am investigating reducing io_request_lock contention in the shorter term
if possible with smaller incremental modifications. So I'm first trying to
discover any previous work that might have been done toward this purpose.
--
Jonathan Lahr
IBM Linux Technology Center
Beaverton, Oregon
lahr@us.ibm.com
503-578-3385
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-10 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-09 19:39 io_request_lock patch? Jonathan Lahr
2001-07-09 19:44 ` Jens Axboe
2001-07-10 19:49 ` Jonathan Lahr [this message]
2001-07-10 20:09 ` Eric Youngdale
2001-07-11 8:05 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-10 11:55 Dipankar Sarma
2001-07-10 23:05 ` Mike Anderson
2001-07-11 7:15 ` Jens Axboe
2001-07-11 8:53 ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-07-11 8:53 ` Jens Axboe
2001-07-11 14:02 ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-07-11 14:01 ` Jens Axboe
2001-07-11 14:55 ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-07-11 19:16 ` Jens Axboe
2001-07-11 16:02 ` Mike Anderson
2001-07-11 19:20 ` Jens Axboe
2001-07-11 20:13 ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-07-11 20:17 ` Jens Axboe
2001-07-11 21:05 ` Mike Anderson
2001-07-11 7:19 ` Jens Axboe
2001-07-11 8:39 ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-07-11 8:47 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010710124903.H6013@us.ibm.com \
--to=lahr@us.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox