public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Lahr <lahr@us.ibm.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: io_request_lock patch?
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:49:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010710124903.H6013@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010709123936.E6013@us.ibm.com> <20010709214453.U16505@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <20010709214453.U16505@suse.de>; from axboe@suse.de on Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 09:44:53PM +0200

Jens Axboe [axboe@suse.de] wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09 2001, Jonathan Lahr wrote:
> > 
> > I have heard that a patch to reduce io_request_lock contention by
> > breaking it into per queue locks was released in the past.  Does 
> > anyone know where I could find this patch if it exists?
> 
> I had a patch about a year ago that did it safely for the block layer
> and IDE at least, and also for selected SCSI hba's. Some of the latter
> variety are pretty hard and/or tedious to fixup, Eric Y has done some
> work automating this process almost completely. Until that is done, the
> general patch has no chance of being integrated.

I am investigating reducing io_request_lock contention in the shorter term
if possible with smaller incremental modifications.  So I'm first trying to 
discover any previous work that might have been done toward this purpose.

-- 
Jonathan Lahr
IBM Linux Technology Center
Beaverton, Oregon
lahr@us.ibm.com
503-578-3385


  reply	other threads:[~2001-07-10 19:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-07-09 19:39 io_request_lock patch? Jonathan Lahr
2001-07-09 19:44 ` Jens Axboe
2001-07-10 19:49   ` Jonathan Lahr [this message]
2001-07-10 20:09     ` Eric Youngdale
2001-07-11  8:05       ` Jens Axboe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-10 11:55 Dipankar Sarma
2001-07-10 23:05 ` Mike Anderson
2001-07-11  7:15   ` Jens Axboe
2001-07-11  8:53   ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-07-11  8:53     ` Jens Axboe
2001-07-11 14:02       ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-07-11 14:01         ` Jens Axboe
2001-07-11 14:55           ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-07-11 19:16             ` Jens Axboe
2001-07-11 16:02     ` Mike Anderson
2001-07-11 19:20       ` Jens Axboe
2001-07-11 20:13         ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-07-11 20:17           ` Jens Axboe
2001-07-11 21:05             ` Mike Anderson
2001-07-11  7:19 ` Jens Axboe
2001-07-11  8:39   ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-07-11  8:47     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010710124903.H6013@us.ibm.com \
    --to=lahr@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox