public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
Cc: kaos@ocs.com.au,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: modules and 2.5
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 00:04:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010712000448.A333@bug.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B4718CC.483CE54E@mandrakesoft.com> <m15J9BM-000CGlC@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <m15J9BM-000CGlC@localhost>; from Rusty Russell on Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 05:40:43PM +1000

Hi!

> > IMHO you should be free to bump the module reference count up and down
> > as you wish, and be able to read the module reference count.
> > 
> > If you make that assumption, then it becomes possible to use the module
> > ref count as an internal reference counter, for device opens or
> > something like that.
> 
> Surely the exception rather than the rule?
> 
> Sorry, complicating the code and making everyone pay the penalty so
> you can take a confusing short cut in your code is not something we're
> going to agree on.

Actually, having uniform interface between kernel and modules is very
nice... And one int per module does not surely hurt, does it? 

Perhaps #define NEED_USE_COUNT to do it on per-module basis?
								Pavel
-- 
I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care."
Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org

  reply	other threads:[~2001-07-12 21:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-07-03  5:13 RFC: modules and 2.5 Jeff Garzik
2001-07-03  6:50 ` Sean Hunter
2001-07-03  7:05   ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-03  7:16   ` Keith Owens
2001-07-03  7:24     ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-03  7:39       ` Keith Owens
2001-07-03  7:44         ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-03  7:48   ` Fang Han
2001-07-03  7:18 ` Keith Owens
2001-07-03 12:15 ` jlnance
2001-07-06 10:34 ` Rusty Russell
2001-07-07 14:12   ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-08  7:40     ` Rusty Russell
2001-07-11 22:04       ` Pavel Machek [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-03 17:35 Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
2001-07-03 17:39 ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010712000448.A333@bug.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
    --cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox