public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jakob Østergaard" <jakob@unthought.net>
To: Jimmie Mayfield <mayfield+usenet@sackheads.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Interesting disk throughput performance problem
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 12:29:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010722122958.C24136@unthought.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010721233313.A15232@sackheads.org>
In-Reply-To: <20010721233313.A15232@sackheads.org>; from mayfield+usenet@sackheads.org on Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 11:33:13PM -0400

On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 11:33:13PM -0400, Jimmie Mayfield wrote:
> Hi.  I'm running into some disk throughput issues that I can't explain.
> Hopefully someone reading this can offer an explanation.
> 
> One of my machines is running 2.4.5 and has 2 hard drives: a 7200 rpm
> ATA100 Maxtor and a 5400 rpm ATA33 IBM.  Each drive is a master on its own
> controller (AMI CMD649 as found on the IWill KT266-R).  Both drives contain
> reiserfs 3.6x filesystems.  
> 
> By all local benchmarks, the 7200 rpm drive is the faster drive.  But this 
> doesn't seem to be the case for large files originating from remote clients.  
> Witness:
....
> So I tried the test locally:  with the file stored on the 5400rpm drive, 
> scp it to localhost and write it to the 7200rpm drive.  Results were a little 
> below 10MB/sec (CPU near 100% presumably due to encrypting/decrypting on 
> the fly).
> 
> Any ideas why the 7200rpm drive performs so poorly for remote clients but 
> performs wonderfully well when those same operations are performed locally?

This is a wild guess:

Try cat /proc/interrupts

Would the 7200 rpm drive controller happen to share an IRQ with your NIC ?

If so, something is horribly wrong since that shouldn't give that kind of
performance penalty.  But it's my best guess   :)

-- 
................................................................
:   jakob@unthought.net   : And I see the elder races,         :
:.........................: putrid forms of man                :
:   Jakob Østergaard      : See him rise and claim the earth,  :
:        OZ9ABN           : his downfall is at hand.           :
:.........................:............{Konkhra}...............:

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-07-22 10:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-07-22  3:33 Interesting disk throughput performance problem Jimmie Mayfield
2001-07-22  9:20 ` Hans Reiser
2001-07-22 14:07   ` toon
2001-07-22 14:41     ` Hans Reiser
2001-07-22 10:29 ` Jakob Østergaard [this message]
2001-07-22 10:44 ` Mike Black
2001-07-24 15:06   ` Jimmie Mayfield
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-24 17:11 Tim Schmielau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010722122958.C24136@unthought.net \
    --to=jakob@unthought.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mayfield+usenet@sackheads.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox