From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Kai Germaschewski <kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.7 softirq incorrectness.
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:18:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010723161804.C822@athlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010723013416.B23517@athlon.random> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107231113150.27373-100000@chaos.tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107231113150.27373-100000@chaos.tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>; from kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de on Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 11:25:23AM +0200
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 11:25:23AM +0200, Kai Germaschewski wrote:
> Hmmh, wait a second. I take it that means calling netif_rx not from
> hard-irq context, but e.g. from bh is a bug? (Even if the only consequence
No it isn't a bug either, calling it from irq or bh is perfectly fine
w.r.t. softirq latency. If you post it from softirq ksoftirqd will
handle the overflow event exactly like in net_rx_action.
Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-23 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-22 20:44 2.4.7 softirq incorrectness Rusty Russell
2001-07-22 23:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-23 9:06 ` Rusty Russell
2001-07-23 12:05 ` David S. Miller
2001-07-23 14:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-23 14:29 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-24 9:35 ` Rusty Russell
2001-07-25 19:33 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-26 20:26 ` Rusty Russell
2001-07-23 9:25 ` Kai Germaschewski
2001-07-23 11:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-23 14:18 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2001-07-23 22:24 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2001-07-25 22:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-26 17:46 ` kuznet
2001-07-26 18:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-26 18:29 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-27 16:48 ` kuznet
2001-07-27 0:47 ` Maksim Krasnyanskiy
2001-07-27 15:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-27 18:31 ` Maksim Krasnyanskiy
2001-07-27 18:59 ` kuznet
2001-07-27 19:21 ` Maksim Krasnyanskiy
2001-07-27 19:35 ` kuznet
2001-07-28 0:52 ` [PATCH] [IMPORTANT] " Maksim Krasnyanskiy
2001-07-28 17:41 ` kuznet
2001-07-28 18:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-28 19:02 ` kuznet
2001-07-28 19:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-28 23:28 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2001-07-29 17:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-29 17:52 ` kuznet
2001-07-30 18:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-07-30 22:47 ` Nigel Gamble
2001-07-30 22:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-07-31 18:08 ` kuznet
2001-07-28 17:54 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-28 19:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-30 18:32 ` Maksim Krasnyanskiy
2001-07-27 9:34 ` David S. Miller
2001-07-27 17:01 ` kuznet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010723161804.C822@athlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox