From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 19:25:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 19:25:25 -0400 Received: from lorax.neutraldomain.org ([64.81.248.141]:62474 "HELO lorax.neutraldomain.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 19:25:16 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:26:36 -0700 From: Gabriel Rocha To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Status of NTFS support was Re: [PATCH] 2.4.7 More tiny NTFS fixes Message-ID: <20010723162636.E36051@neutraldomain.org> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing ,----[ On Tue, Jul 24, at 12:14AM, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: | Please apply below patch. It is against 2.4.7 and adds three more |return checks (it is orthogonal to the one sent on Sunday). `----[ End Quote ]--------------------------- Not that I understand what this means, I have no idea. But, I know that NTFS used to be really poorly supported in the kernel. I have seen a few patches to it ove rthe past couple of weeks and makes me wonder what the status of it is now. Anyone care to comment? --gabe -- "It's not brave, if you're not scared."