From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Maksim Krasnyanskiy <maxk@qualcomm.com>
Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@transmeta.com, mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [IMPORTANT] Re: 2.4.7 softirq incorrectness.
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 21:17:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010728211703.A11441@athlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.0.20010727121014.055d4c90@mail1> <200107271935.XAA27068@ms2.inr.ac.ru> <4.3.1.0.20010727141716.05651ac0@mail1> <20010728195404.D12090@athlon.random>
In-Reply-To: <20010728195404.D12090@athlon.random>; from andrea@suse.de on Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 07:54:04PM +0200
On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 07:54:04PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 05:52:01PM -0700, Maksim Krasnyanskiy wrote:
> > tasklet_schedule calls tasklet_unlock after it schedules tasklet, which is _totaly_ wrong.
>
> yes, it was a leftover from 2.4.6. Your diff -u 2.4.7 2.4.5 is correct
> and I also suggest it for for mainline inclusion, thanks.
I did some minor further improvement to it while merging it into my tree
and then I rediffed it. This one also adds the debug check for
local_bh_enable in a clied region. (note for other archs:
__cpu_raise_softirq is required to be atomic with respect to irqs but it
doesn't need to be atomic with respect to smp, in x86 it is implemented
as a non locked bts for example)
diff -urN 2.4.7/include/asm-i386/softirq.h softirq/include/asm-i386/softirq.h
--- 2.4.7/include/asm-i386/softirq.h Wed Jul 25 22:38:08 2001
+++ softirq/include/asm-i386/softirq.h Sat Jul 28 21:11:35 2001
@@ -25,7 +25,11 @@
#define local_bh_enable() \
do { \
unsigned int *ptr = &local_bh_count(smp_processor_id()); \
+ unsigned long flags; \
\
+ __save_flags(flags); \
+ if (!(flags & (1 << 9))) \
+ BUG(); \
barrier(); \
if (!--*ptr) \
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
diff -urN 2.4.7/include/linux/interrupt.h softirq/include/linux/interrupt.h
--- 2.4.7/include/linux/interrupt.h Sun Jul 22 01:16:45 2001
+++ softirq/include/linux/interrupt.h Sat Jul 28 21:09:15 2001
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
enum
{
TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, /* Tasklet is scheduled for execution */
- TASKLET_STATE_RUN /* Tasklet is running */
+ TASKLET_STATE_RUN /* Tasklet is running (SMP only) */
};
struct tasklet_head
@@ -129,34 +129,80 @@
extern struct tasklet_head tasklet_vec[NR_CPUS];
extern struct tasklet_head tasklet_hi_vec[NR_CPUS];
-#define tasklet_trylock(t) (!test_and_set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &(t)->state))
-#define tasklet_unlock(t) do { smp_mb__before_clear_bit(); clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &(t)->state); } while(0)
-#define tasklet_unlock_wait(t) while (test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &(t)->state)) { barrier(); }
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+static inline int tasklet_trylock(struct tasklet_struct *t)
+{
+ return !test_and_set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &(t)->state);
+}
+
+static inline void tasklet_unlock(struct tasklet_struct *t)
+{
+ smp_mb__before_clear_bit();
+ clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &(t)->state);
+}
+
+static inline void tasklet_unlock_wait(struct tasklet_struct *t)
+{
+ while (test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &(t)->state)) { barrier(); }
+}
+#else
+#define tasklet_trylock(t) 1
+#define tasklet_unlock_wait(t) do { } while (0)
+#define tasklet_unlock(t) do { } while (0)
+#endif
+
+static inline void tasklet_schedule(struct tasklet_struct *t)
+{
+ if (!test_and_set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state)) {
+ int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ t->next = tasklet_vec[cpu].list;
+ tasklet_vec[cpu].list = t;
+ cpu_raise_softirq(cpu, TASKLET_SOFTIRQ);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+ }
+}
+
+static inline void tasklet_hi_schedule(struct tasklet_struct *t)
+{
+ if (!test_and_set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state)) {
+ int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ t->next = tasklet_hi_vec[cpu].list;
+ tasklet_hi_vec[cpu].list = t;
+ cpu_raise_softirq(cpu, HI_SOFTIRQ);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+ }
+}
-extern void tasklet_schedule(struct tasklet_struct *t);
-extern void tasklet_hi_schedule(struct tasklet_struct *t);
static inline void tasklet_disable_nosync(struct tasklet_struct *t)
{
atomic_inc(&t->count);
+ smp_mb__after_atomic_inc();
}
static inline void tasklet_disable(struct tasklet_struct *t)
{
tasklet_disable_nosync(t);
tasklet_unlock_wait(t);
+ smp_mb();
}
static inline void tasklet_enable(struct tasklet_struct *t)
{
- if (atomic_dec_and_test(&t->count))
- tasklet_schedule(t);
+ smp_mb__before_atomic_dec();
+ atomic_dec(&t->count);
}
static inline void tasklet_hi_enable(struct tasklet_struct *t)
{
- if (atomic_dec_and_test(&t->count))
- tasklet_hi_schedule(t);
+ smp_mb__before_atomic_dec();
+ atomic_dec(&t->count);
}
extern void tasklet_kill(struct tasklet_struct *t);
diff -urN 2.4.7/kernel/softirq.c softirq/kernel/softirq.c
--- 2.4.7/kernel/softirq.c Sat Jul 21 00:04:34 2001
+++ softirq/kernel/softirq.c Sat Jul 28 21:09:46 2001
@@ -143,43 +143,7 @@
/* Tasklets */
struct tasklet_head tasklet_vec[NR_CPUS] __cacheline_aligned;
-
-void tasklet_schedule(struct tasklet_struct *t)
-{
- unsigned long flags;
- int cpu;
-
- cpu = smp_processor_id();
- local_irq_save(flags);
- /*
- * If nobody is running it then add it to this CPU's
- * tasklet queue.
- */
- if (!test_and_set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state)) {
- t->next = tasklet_vec[cpu].list;
- tasklet_vec[cpu].list = t;
- cpu_raise_softirq(cpu, TASKLET_SOFTIRQ);
- tasklet_unlock(t);
- }
- local_irq_restore(flags);
-}
-
-void tasklet_hi_schedule(struct tasklet_struct *t)
-{
- unsigned long flags;
- int cpu;
-
- cpu = smp_processor_id();
- local_irq_save(flags);
-
- if (!test_and_set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state)) {
- t->next = tasklet_hi_vec[cpu].list;
- tasklet_hi_vec[cpu].list = t;
- cpu_raise_softirq(cpu, HI_SOFTIRQ);
- tasklet_unlock(t);
- }
- local_irq_restore(flags);
-}
+struct tasklet_head tasklet_hi_vec[NR_CPUS] __cacheline_aligned;
static void tasklet_action(struct softirq_action *a)
{
@@ -196,29 +160,25 @@
list = list->next;
- if (!tasklet_trylock(t))
- BUG();
- if (!atomic_read(&t->count)) {
- if (!test_and_clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state))
- BUG();
- t->func(t->data);
+ if (tasklet_trylock(t)) {
+ if (!atomic_read(&t->count)) {
+ if (!test_and_clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state))
+ BUG();
+ t->func(t->data);
+ tasklet_unlock(t);
+ continue;
+ }
tasklet_unlock(t);
- continue;
}
- tasklet_unlock(t);
local_irq_disable();
t->next = tasklet_vec[cpu].list;
tasklet_vec[cpu].list = t;
- cpu_raise_softirq(cpu, TASKLET_SOFTIRQ);
local_irq_enable();
+ __cpu_raise_softirq(cpu, TASKLET_SOFTIRQ);
}
}
-
-
-struct tasklet_head tasklet_hi_vec[NR_CPUS] __cacheline_aligned;
-
static void tasklet_hi_action(struct softirq_action *a)
{
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
@@ -234,22 +194,22 @@
list = list->next;
- if (!tasklet_trylock(t))
- BUG();
- if (!atomic_read(&t->count)) {
- if (!test_and_clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state))
- BUG();
- t->func(t->data);
+ if (tasklet_trylock(t)) {
+ if (!atomic_read(&t->count)) {
+ if (!test_and_clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state))
+ BUG();
+ t->func(t->data);
+ tasklet_unlock(t);
+ continue;
+ }
tasklet_unlock(t);
- continue;
}
- tasklet_unlock(t);
local_irq_disable();
t->next = tasklet_hi_vec[cpu].list;
tasklet_hi_vec[cpu].list = t;
- cpu_raise_softirq(cpu, HI_SOFTIRQ);
local_irq_enable();
+ __cpu_raise_softirq(cpu, HI_SOFTIRQ);
}
}
diff -urN 2.4.7/net/core/dev.c softirq/net/core/dev.c
--- 2.4.7/net/core/dev.c Sat Jul 21 00:04:34 2001
+++ softirq/net/core/dev.c Sat Jul 28 21:10:20 2001
@@ -1217,10 +1217,10 @@
enqueue:
dev_hold(skb->dev);
__skb_queue_tail(&queue->input_pkt_queue,skb);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
/* Runs from irqs or BH's, no need to wake BH */
__cpu_raise_softirq(this_cpu, NET_RX_SOFTIRQ);
- local_irq_restore(flags);
#ifndef OFFLINE_SAMPLE
get_sample_stats(this_cpu);
#endif
@@ -1529,10 +1529,10 @@
local_irq_disable();
netdev_rx_stat[this_cpu].time_squeeze++;
+ local_irq_enable();
/* This already runs in BH context, no need to wake up BH's */
__cpu_raise_softirq(this_cpu, NET_RX_SOFTIRQ);
- local_irq_enable();
NET_PROFILE_LEAVE(softnet_process);
return;
Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-28 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-22 20:44 2.4.7 softirq incorrectness Rusty Russell
2001-07-22 23:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-23 9:06 ` Rusty Russell
2001-07-23 12:05 ` David S. Miller
2001-07-23 14:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-23 14:29 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-24 9:35 ` Rusty Russell
2001-07-25 19:33 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-26 20:26 ` Rusty Russell
2001-07-23 9:25 ` Kai Germaschewski
2001-07-23 11:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-23 14:18 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-23 22:24 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2001-07-25 22:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-26 17:46 ` kuznet
2001-07-26 18:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-26 18:29 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-27 16:48 ` kuznet
2001-07-27 0:47 ` Maksim Krasnyanskiy
2001-07-27 15:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-27 18:31 ` Maksim Krasnyanskiy
2001-07-27 18:59 ` kuznet
2001-07-27 19:21 ` Maksim Krasnyanskiy
2001-07-27 19:35 ` kuznet
2001-07-28 0:52 ` [PATCH] [IMPORTANT] " Maksim Krasnyanskiy
2001-07-28 17:41 ` kuznet
2001-07-28 18:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-28 19:02 ` kuznet
2001-07-28 19:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-28 23:28 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2001-07-29 17:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-29 17:52 ` kuznet
2001-07-30 18:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-07-30 22:47 ` Nigel Gamble
2001-07-30 22:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-07-31 18:08 ` kuznet
2001-07-28 17:54 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-28 19:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2001-07-30 18:32 ` Maksim Krasnyanskiy
2001-07-27 9:34 ` David S. Miller
2001-07-27 17:01 ` kuznet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010728211703.A11441@athlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox