public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
To: Rob Landley <landley@webofficenow.com>
Cc: Paul Flinders <ptf@ftel.co.uk>,
	lm@bitmover.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SIS 630E perf problems?
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 08:16:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010807081652.A11619@work.bitmover.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200108061713.f76HDaj16575@work.bitmover.com> <3B6F14E2.3030209@ftel.co.uk> <01080618523906.04153@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <01080618523906.04153@localhost.localdomain>; from landley@webofficenow.com on Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 06:52:39PM -0400

> I've used a few funky SIS chipsets, on and off, for a long time now, and they 
> always have one leeeetle problem...
> 
> Try benchmarking it with a lower screen resolution (like 640x480x256 colors). 
>  If the video is sharing main memory, it's sharing the memory bandwidth as 
> well.  So you've basically got a constant ultra-high-priority DMA going to 
> the screen, sucking up bandwidth and fighting with everything else.  
> (Everything else MUST lose or the display would sparkle.  
> 1280x1024x32bitsx70hz is HOW much bandwidth we're talking here?)

OK, a copuple of updates on this:

I wasn't running X when I ran the benchmarks.

I played around with the bios settings enough to make the machine not
pass POST anymore so I reset the CMOS.  Doing that, plus telling the
system to autodetect DRAM clocks dropped the latencies down to 260ns
outside of X and 281ns with X running.  Still not fantastic but good
enough I suppose.

In reference to the fans that someone else mentioned: I think it is the
CPU fan making the noise.  Regardless, the MTBF of the power supply fans
is one year.  I have about a dozen of generation 1 of these bookpcs and
the fans all started failing at 1 year and frying the power supplies.
Those dinky power supplies are hard to find so you want to avoid this.
We bought a pile of fans and replaced them all; one benefit is that the
higher quality fans are much less noisy.  Something to look into.
-- 
---
Larry McVoy            	 lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm 

  reply	other threads:[~2001-08-07 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-08-06 17:13 SIS 630E perf problems? Larry McVoy
2001-08-06 22:06 ` Paul Flinders
2001-08-06 22:52   ` Rob Landley
2001-08-07 15:16     ` Larry McVoy [this message]
2001-08-09  8:19       ` Rob Landley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010807081652.A11619@work.bitmover.com \
    --to=lm@bitmover.com \
    --cc=landley@webofficenow.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ptf@ftel.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox