From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 11 Aug 2001 12:14:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 11 Aug 2001 12:14:19 -0400 Received: from smtp.mailbox.co.uk ([195.82.125.32]:24212 "EHLO smtp.mailbox.net.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 11 Aug 2001 12:14:08 -0400 Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 17:14:16 +0100 From: Russell King To: Philip Blundell Cc: Keith Owens , kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, Release 1.1 is available. Message-ID: <20010811171416.C2732@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <1904.997542180@ocs3.ocs-net> <20010811162028.A2732@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from philb@gnu.org on Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 05:08:08PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 05:08:08PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote: > I should think it can be made to work in 2.95.4. Amazing response to the problem here. ;) > Did you try the patch I sent you a few months ago? No - I've not had a need to rebuild gcc yet, and the patch is low priority since the kernel has to build with the compilers that people already have, not the bleeding edge. Sorry, I don't do gcc, as I've explained before. -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html